Talk:Hideyoshi Nagachika/@comment-30181061-20171009145551/@comment-190.153.81.210-20171014011817

I can't seem to get onto the the "hype" bandwagon when it comes to doing things for the sake of parallelism. What do you get by giving another title? Conclusion? No, confusion. Ishida can very well settle things with :re; there's no need to go all over again, it just doesn't work like that. The reason why :re's introduction was a shock was because the notice of the prequel ending, and a new installment was abrupt.

The unaddressed plot-points and incongruous pacing have a reason laid on slate — Third time's the charm isn't meant for everything, fellas.