Talk:Matsuri Washuu/@comment-89.114.169.171-20150821194743/@comment-24209523-20150825223820

I understand that you disagree completely, as there have been many instances in which young ghouls have been orphaned. Specifically in the scenario that you mentioned.

However, I suppose I should say that we will both agree to disagree, because I still find it very fishy for a Washuu such as Matsuri to let a child escape. And I still stand by what I said to begin with. A child speaks of innocence, and setting an innocent child up against a man who's assumed to have none was not done on accident, therefore I still believe that Kanae's survival was done on purpose.

It also speaks of the mercy that Matsuri is not said to have had. Again, going back to innocence, I see Kanae's survival as foreshadowing of Matsuri's very real, yet very hidden remorse and innocence.

It would mean so much if he let a ghoul child escape, yet had his platoon killed. A child is harmless and pure, and the fact that Kanae is still alive gives insight to Maturi's character.

Alongside that, we haven't' seen Matsuri really comment about a supposed survivor of the Rosewald investigation, in such a way that he credits that he may have missed one. And then going back to his lineage, it's odd for him to have missed something so minuscule. And I know you don't believe there is any merit in that, but we haven't seen anything to suggest otherwise.

And while you could be very right and I could be very wrong, I'll stick by my thought/opinion until we get more insight into the Rosewald investigation, because that part is still very unclear in the manga.

“Wild scenario”? Is Ishida not one for such things.

But like I said, we'll stay strong in our opinions until we see something that trumps the other's.