Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-24992802-20160818003801/@comment-27247962-20161214173408

Sure, Sam. But that goes both ways.

Aaron was backing-up the people who belief Eto is still very much alive, based on Ishida's writer methods. To define this opinion as skeptical, immediately indicates the opposite opinion isn't skeptical. So the opinion Advocate has been sharing, is not skeptical. (not much respect for that opinion i'd say) And if you're going to attach inviting & stylish words to make your standpoint seem more just & truthfull, you better brace yourself for it to come tearing down just as hard if it's not true.

I can't really call people who have Ishida's writer methods as sole argumentive stance, skeptical. I'm sorry, that's just the truth of the matter. These people put all their belief in Ishida's writer method being just like he showed with Koma & Irimi --> characters aren't dead if the body isn't shown dead. Hardly any doubt (=skepticism) present, when you put all faith in this writer-rule to back-up your standpoint.

So i'm confused. Do I need to belief you're skeptical and just having an opinion, that isn't your real opinion. Or was it just an opinion you consider skeptical, while it isn't skeptical...

I respect everyones opinion if they're upfront about it. Believing Eto is alive, is a belief. To consider her dead, is more like a conclusion of the facts shown.

I have no qualms with an opinion based on belief, I have qualms if you try to deny it being a belief.

Feel free to proof me wrong at any time. I'm just as easily fixated on my judgement being correct, that I easily ignore certain factors as well, when making my judgement.

No hard feelings from my side, i'll just not aknowledge that opinion right now.