Talk:Re: Chapter 130/@comment-86.98.109.99-20170625195046/@comment-27247962-20170626165812

^If we're going to talk about correctness. Stating one is "not very good at arguing", while only having one example of this, isn't considered a very accurate declaration. You generalize the anon's capacity based on this argument you are winning. Therefore not an objective ascertainment, but rather emphasizing your succes in this argument --> indirectly a personal attack.

If you like these arguments where people are trying to be overly correct with each other, then i'm sure you don't mind this either.

If Touka was mirroring, she'd eat human meat. Which she doesn't. Guess we're not entirely there yet. It's a parallel, but not a clear cut parallel. When anon talks about a contradiction he isn't anymore wrong then you two, because we miss a piece of information to safely define it as either. Touka is ghoul, while Ukina is human, can be considered a contradiction. Ukina can eat human meat and human food, without her health deteriorating. Touka's health will deteriorate when eating human food, this is different. That is the contradiction. Even if you say that this isn't a necessary for Touka to do, this is still the contradiction taking place right now. As long as you, I or anyone else doesn't know for sure why Touka does this, then you won't be able to put this argument to a stop. Therefore I agree with the anon disputing 'contradiction' that you can't talk about a contradiction yet when it comes to the baby's survivability and Touka's vs Ukina's nurturing, cuz we'll just have to wait that out. The 'contradiction' anon was solely talking about the fact that Touka/Ukina start their pregnancy from contradicting points and wether these points converge with time, is something not even you or the anon disputing 'contradiction' can predict at this point. Therefore it seems like you're arguing about 'contradiction', while you can't yet convincingly dispute it. It's only in your head that everything is already decided.

Or can you convince me why it's all so clear in there?

Even if it is, anon still isn't wrong that the starting point is a contradiction. That's how tedious we can make this argument be and that's where you'll have to agree with anon, if you still want some credibility to your own stance.