Talk:Re: Chapter 125/@comment-10733658-20170524055618/@comment-217.212.214.57-20170524090332

^ And I also know about those people... They go under the category "doormats" since they basically stopped thinking and just takes everything coming their way without a second thought.

(No offense to the doormats, if they don't want to think, I won't force them to.)

I got it from this example: "Ask a European about the face of god and they will claim it to be blonde and bright-skinned, ask an african and they will claim it to be dark-haired dark-skinned and if animals could talk, for example, a parrot or a lion, then they would claim God to have a beak and feathers or fur and fangs respectively."

The simple reason of this mentioned above, is due to vanity and an arrogant attempt of people trying to put themselves on a higher piedestal than others by claiming themselves to be "closer" to the "absolute power" than others. It's just childish, immature, arrogance of children, in a sense.

...

You have to elaborate on that statement, because right now, it got four different definitions and meanings, all different and contrary to each other...and I don't want to answer wrongly on this one.

Elaborate please.

...

That aside, I find it a bit hypocritical of the Western fandom to critize Ishida for his/her work, as before the anime came out, Tokyo Ghoul was practically under the radar and completely unknown to the western fandom as a manga (Me included, since I only discovered it when it was like what...120 chapters in? Marathon reading before the anime came out at least...) And after the anime, Tokyo Ghoul got a massive boost in its fandom and popularity over in the western hemisphere...yet it is the western fandom complaining about it now?

So ungrateful... I can understand the pain in the "Original fandom" (When Tokyo Ghoul was only a manga) upon seeing this happening to their favorite story and author. (Unless this happened before the anime came out, or before the manga got caught in the wind in the west for real...)

Authors should only be critized if "continuity errors" appears in their works or there's too much "Deus Ex Machina" ruining their stories (I am glaring at Hiro Mashima now, as an example to be avoided.) but critizising an author for two people finally establishing a relationship (Kaneki & Touka) or how they are depicted in-story? (Eto, Mutsuki...etc...), due to personal preferences that happened to not come through?

That is unacceptable and the critics deserve to get the boot for trying to impose their fanfiction versions of the work into canon territory. (reality rejection is never pretty...just look what happened when Bleach ended. So. Many. Haters went completely ballistic over how it turned out that it wasn't even pitiful...)

The Japanese fandom have every right to critizise the rest of the fandom for such bad behavior and I will not be surprised if the ones putting the chapters up ahead of the release dates simply stops doing so if Ishida puts down the foot and gives them the ultimatum.

The author have the right to do that after all...

So in the end, (being one part of the fandom that knows the hardships and passion of writing a story), I hope the immature brats in the fandom take time to grow up as people, eventually, and cease this behavior at once...

...or the access to Tokyo ghoul might turn out to be hindered in the future.