Talk:Touka Kirishima/@comment-29572225-20160706142303/@comment-27247962-20160707205433

The weird thing that I notice is that when a discussion about Touka is happening, not trolling, a reall discussions with people who disagree and agree, it gets out of hand because of the focus on a feeling oriented argument.

I'm not sure why that angers people so much. If it's a feeling that makes someone not like Touka as much, then it should be 10x easier to leave the discussion be, since it's subjective to only that person. If it were an argument based on facts and logic, then i'd understand if it gets a bit heated.

What I find weird is that people have a hard time distinguishing the feelarguments (alias silly arguments) from the factarguemnts or rather feel it's more important to focus on the feelargument and try to force that person to feel different regarding the argument he made.

That's what makes things get out of hand. Trolling on Touka page is fairly well ignored or has immediate intervention of a moderator.

If there's more respect for how people feel & just accept the different feelings, then there wouldn't be so much ruckus on this page. But for some reason not liking Touka seems like a crime. Not having factual arguments for not liking Touka, is unacceptable. That's what some of these threads imply.

Agree or disagree, that's the overall feeling that I receive when disagreeing with Touka's character. And i'm not the one that can change that feeling... I assume other disagreers can't either.