Talk:Eto Yoshimura/@comment-28408523-20160509054227/@comment-27247962-20160511185010

^I'd say it's based on how much of a threat you are to civilians, human society, rather then CCG members. Since they chose this line of work, so they are aware and agree with the repercussions. I wouldn't make my danger list in function of how many CCG members they can kill, that's just too shallow.

I'd make my list in function off knowing how much damage they can do to a city and it's inhabitants, the amount of destruction they can cause. That'll automatically encompass which tactic they need to use to have a good chance.

It's CCG's task to be prepared for the amount of casualties such a threat can cause and choose the most effective strategy to get the least casualties.

Because they only fight CCG, it seems that you are a bit too fixated on what they can do to CCG members only. It would be a very ignorant decision, if you don't factor in the sheer amount of destruction they can cause to structures and the like.

It's an important part to come out of a fight with the least amount of casualties on your sight, so that's something I certainly don't dispute, but it's a shallow threat level rank, if the ranking doesn't envelop the sheer destruction that one ghoul can cause to non-living objects and the collateral damage that can cause.

CCG casualties is grave, City destruction and "innocent" casualties, is graver. Better be prepared to prevent the last one as much as possible, because that's their task, besides exterminating ghouls.

Sorry, chicken, I don't think you'll convince me of something else this time.