Talk:Matsuri Washuu/@comment-24494906-20150628132659/@comment-24209523-20150728170746

Lols, peope are assuming he's adopted because of his name in order to prove a theory? Consider in TG, children look a lot like their parents/relatives. A lot. And I think Ishida does that on purpose.

Look at the Kirishima's, the Kuroiwas, the Kaneki's, Yomo and his sister, the Nishios, the Fuegichi's, the Washuus, is there anyone I'm forgetting?

You can't assume he's adopted based off of three names, that's not smart. And like someone pointed out, someone in the family didn't even follow the Yoshi, and he's an ancestor. Daikichi Washuu, I assume he must've been adopted because his name isn't "Yoshi"? Really, if you're basing a theory off of that speculating, it's groundless.

And I think if anything, the recent confrotation between Marude and Matsuri just proves that he is in fact, an actual heir. And we already know they have friction, both father and son. His negligance to name his son as his father named him may speak hints of just what goes on inside of their family.

He may be a disgrace to Yoshitoki for some reason, thus Yoshitoki has messed with his inhertaince? But to assume Matsuri is not a Washuu based on a break in a patter when we've only seen three generations, nevermind the fact that there is Daikichi Washuu, and on top of that Marude regards him as the heir (it's about preserving Washuu genes, they would not have someone who is adopted as an heir for the CCG).

So again, if you're only argument for that theory is a name change, then you need to try harder.