Board Thread:Questions and Answers/@comment-31190419-20170130180218/@comment-27247962-20170131225128

EdgyBlade wrote: So basically you aren't even convinced that he's actually deceased, but you don't mind being wrong, even when there is an "unknown" option available to you. Well if that's your attitude I have nothing to convince you of. What's with the obsession to be 'right'. It's been showed by several users now. Is it really so embarrassing to be wrong about a story you aren't even writing, where the writer decides the flow & can choose whenever & how to mislead you.

If you're only going to theorize with 'being right' in your mind, you might as well just stop theorizing at all.

The way Blue Luna constructed her thoughts, is perhaps the most balanced & clear way of stating a thought yet. She follows the story & facts the story presents, but the keeps her assesment of Ishida's writing pretty open. Her assesment of the writer has less influence then what the writer writes about. You seem to be having a chessgame with Ishida with the goal of winning by keeping up with his mental game, while Luna just analyzes the story. There is no competitive element present.

Which means Luna's focus is on point, while yours is currently completely fixated on your assessment of Ishida, which can be proven wrong at any time. His writing can change at any moment, when you still think you've figured him out.