Thread:Harostar/@comment-27247962-20160509051925/@comment-27247962-20160516100418

Lol sorry for my impatience, just thought this was burried under all your comments, so I reminded you.

Well then they can sue him for forgery, not plagiarism. For me it's just he point, that 'plagiarism' is a word that should've never existed, since it's just a broader and less trustworthy one then forgery, which can only be used when proof is effectively found. Plagiarism just goes about indications. If someone with a smaller list of 'plagiarized' topics was sued, he'd have a much bigger punishment then is actually deserved. It's a mistake anyone can make by being careless & who isn't careless once in awhile because off lazyness...