Talk:Re: Chapter 172/@comment-26544002-20180516045100/@comment-26940038-20180518192019

^^ I guess that depends on if the group getting erradicated is still killing members of the other group or not. As long as ghouls are still killing humans the humans won't stop hunting them.

If it's about getting eaten or not there isn't much room for morals. It's obvious that humans wouldn't just accept a small group of ghouls in their society if it means there will be still human's getting eaten by them. They can't just tolerate humans dying because they feel like it's the morally right thing to be mercyful. That's like living in a nation that tolerates murder as long as it's just a small number. For a human who is at risk of getting killed it doesn't matter if the one killing has a good reason to do so.

You'd have to be a neutral observer (like a reader) to be able to accept a society where everyone just lives by their nature and is allowed to do what's needed to survive, even if it means killing each other.

If the number of ghouls who are still alive would be small enough to be kept under control and they would be willing to feed exclusively off corpses then humanity could maybe afford letting them live. But they'd propably have to live in a designated area behind a fence. I don't think there is a chance of a human government accepting ghouls to live next to humans.