Thread:Old McDonald/@comment-10733658-20141218235444/@comment-24494906-20141219002608

I think we don't need that aside into law. You might be correct, but we don't know how that stuff works in TG's world, and I think CCG would have the authority to make a special exception. Thus, while it justifies your position on this topic, I think it doesn't belong in such a paragraph.

Heading is fine.

I think the paragraph should state the following:
 * First, that Mutsuki was born female, lived his early years as a female and is stated as being female in the profile. (This first because it fits chronologically and is what's officially stated in the profile. Also, it's natural to build up the reasoning for the pronouns the article uses.)
 * Second, that when Mutsuki was picked up by CCG, he requested to live as a young man from now on because he has been feeling an aversion towards his existence as a female since long ago that he can't explain. He and his colleagues refer to him with masculine pronouns. (I don't think you need to state which ones, but references to the chapters would be great.) You can also mention that he wears men's clothing and uses the men's bathroom.
 * You might include at this point that it's speculated that Mutsuki is transsexual, but then you should probably also mention the opposite point of view.
 * Last, that according to Mutsuki's expressed wish and his treatment by his colleagues, the article will consistently use male pronouns to refer to him.

I think this paragraph should be as concise as possible. Any additional, unnecessary remark just gives more openings for dispute, and we want to word the article in such a way that