Talk:Touka Kirishima/@comment-49.49.243.65-20161208091152/@comment-27247962-20161208185220

I feel like this point is being overlooked:

There is nothing to deal with here, except that everyone has his personal opinion towards a character. There is no guidebook when it comes to judging or liking a character. So i f you speak or discuss something with a person that doesn't share the same viewpoint on a character, then I'm the one who has to deal with that person's viewpoint, with the probability that he/she might sway me to his/her side. Same goes with the person who shared his viewpoint, he/she'll have to deal with people who don't like a character exactly for the reasons he/she likes the character.

There is no discrimination. Just as much as someone is allowed to like a character, someone else is allowed to not like that same character. Ofcourse haters shouldn't use foul language & ofcourse people who like a character shouldn't blame dislikers for not liking a character and certainly not throw them in the same category as people who insult a character on impuls.

Just as much as likers have to swallow the 'when will she die', dislikers have to swallow the constant 'Touken' -oneliners. We're both shortsighted in our arguments. Dislikers don't even consider giving her a "second" chance to redeem herself, they just go straight for death-sentence. Likers seem to only care about ships, when it comes to a characters importance. They shackle the character to another person and that should prove how great the character is. So yeah you think it's weird both groups find each others arguments to be a bit shortsighted and superficial? Haters need to chill. Likers need to chill. Neutrals need to create the chill by being diplomatic.