Talk:Hideyoshi Nagachika/@comment-217.81.215.13-20150401193731/@comment-26401141-20150401215952

you know, I heard that theory a couple times before, and didn't really think of it as anything. it sounded like a big stretch, something too far-fetched, even for Ishida...but this blog you're linking to is amazing. i'm seeing the whole issue with a new light now.

I also noticed that there were a lot of subtle differences, with how characters reacted to a particular situation, and how certain quotes were made when they didn't seem like they were necessary. I used to put it off as just Ishida's style lol, but when you put in a theory like this with all those minor details...he dots reaaaally seem to connect. And I also realized that you can't really say anything or know anything for sure unless you read ALL of Ishida's work, like the omakes and novels (which srsly need to be translated, I wanna read them!!!). That's the only real way to know all of the details in order to reach a conclusion about a theory in this manga

But nice catch! Dang...the hype is real lol. It's still a stretch for me, but I guess I'm more than half convinced about that theory. And I think the author is the type of guy who makes certain references and implications purposefully, in order to let his readers connect the dots and figure things out for themselves, which is another reason why I love this manga. Thanks for the amazing link lol