Thread:Uncle Nimu-Dash/@comment-27247962-20161224174829/@comment-27347196-20170117201539

It greatly depends on who is interpreting Dayne.

Some simply take things too literal, well decide to, since it is easier over trying to think, while other do think.

If I were to say for example that "2+2=5" you will have two type of people who will understand it differently. You will have people taking it literally and seriously thinking I'm idiot who thinks that "2+2=5", simply because it is easier to believe that I'm truly that much of idiot. While you got others like Cherry,you and even Obvious, who will get that my bullshit was bullshit and that I truly don't think that "2+2=5", that I actually do know it is "4" but am refusing to give actual answer on purpose.

Obvious himself is butchering most of grammar on purpose, not all but most he is doing on purpose, like me with "dis" and "dat", now question is who will get it and who will truly fall thinking that is how he actually spells despite "butt","ass" and insert number "4=for" or "2=to/too" being obvious dead giveaway this isn't accident grammar mistake that happens to him.

Now who falls for it, isn't my problem nor anyone else's, it is problem of person who decided to take something literally before trying to process it.