Board Thread:General Discussion/@comment-26358011-20151127155916/@comment-10733658-20151128060541

Here's my two cents, strictly in terms of what I have observed.

1. This is kind of a moot point, in my opinion, since the two terms are pretty interchangeable for the majority of characters. It's an either or kind of thing.

2. I'm leery of going back and forth on things. The two traits are a result of discussion and agreement among the community, and seem to satisfy all but the most stubbornly militant of parties on both sides of the aisle. I can really only think of one or two complaints about it I have personally seen (other than random Trolling Anons), and otherwise it seems to be a handling of things that is well-received and seen as acceptable. As such, it seems to me that going back on something that the community has repeatedly agreed upon to satisfy a very vocal, militant minority is questionable.

3. Like you said, it's basically a whole lot of effort for nothing.

Anyway, that is my observation on things. I'll let people discuss the pros and cons of such a thing, and we'll see what people think.