Thread:Old McDonald/@comment-188432-20160808200621/@comment-24494906-20160930230329

Sorry, I was on vacation.

Anyway, I took a look. This is mostly fine, but at least at the beginning, I don't think we should use the tag for the images as there are some pages that currently use some freaky code in the image field. That has to be cleaned up first before we use the tag. Until then, we should temporarily use the tag to keep stuff from breaking when we switch to the portable infobox.

I'll check out the CSS later.

I would much prefer a slide show gallery inside the infobox instead of tabs. I hope this feature will be added sometime in the near future.

It would also be great if there was some way to tell the server to supply images of a greater resolution. We use some infoboxes which are a bit larger than 270px. (That might change, but the original non-portable infoboxes were larger than 270px and I decided to replicate the original infobox as closely as possible to keep unintended side effects during the switch to a minimum.) The images should fill the whole width of the infobox, but the server usually only supplies images of 270px. I can force them to fill the space, but then they will just look blurred. Currently, the only way around that limitation that I'm aware of is to replace the tag by a tag and specify the width in the image links. Perhaps you could add some attribute to the tag that gives a hint to the server to supply images of a greater resolution/width if available?