Talk:Karren von Rosewald/@comment-189.217.231.114-20150706072046/@comment-78.35.153.83-20150706210616

The reason why Ishida writes Kanae as a sympatic character is probably because he wants to destroy the stereotype that only people who have no hearts and are cold blooded can do evil things in order to show us "No. Even people who are kind to their families, friends and neighbours can act like monsters". For example: He potrayed us Mado as a cruel sadistic psychopath at first so we could understand the feelings of ghouls better and we easily started to hate Mado because he perfectly fitted the stereotype of a killer, but then he revealed the good sides of him so we could see bad people aren't 100% evil and suddenly people started to feel  sorry for him. He did the same with Yoshimura but instead representing him as evil he did the opposite in his case and later he revealed his crimes. Does this mean Ishida defends killers and think they should get away with their crimes? I don't think so  because Yoshimura said the act of taking life is evil. Nutcracker, Tsukiyama, Arima, Mado, Matsumae, Kanae etc. they are all the same: Not 100% evil but they still committed crimes.