Talk:Hideyoshi Nagachika/@comment-27704373-20161002105415/@comment-25047329-20161003080107

^It's not an unfounded concern, ultimately I'm flexible on the matter because I think multiple arguments have merit. I guess you can say that if the narrative doesn't feel crystal clear on a matter, we try to avoid giving a clear cut answer as well. We did the same thing with the One-Eyed King page more or less. A lot of the evidence pointed to Eto being the OEK to the point characters were saying for a fact that the OEK and OEO were the same and that Eto was the OEK. The pages weren't merged for a bit more complex reasons, but uncertainty played a role.

Though that does bring up the matter of how things are measured. In this case, there's wariness over Kaneki's perspective and what in universe documents say on the matter. A hallucinating Kaneki remembers Hide sacrificing himself and documentation lists him as missing. The information isn't strictly conflicting, but implies different things. Here, I think is where lies a bit of the uncertainly and why the "unknown" lable was slapped on. We're told some things about Hide's fate, but not given a full picture and the perspective of both parties seems shaky.

A Wikia is also a consensus based place however, so a discussion can be started to enact a change if the members feel strongly enough about something and strong arguments are presented.