Thread:Dayne Dariel/@comment-27621207-20180501081140/@comment-27247962-20180503183447

4chan isn't the easiest place to "discuss" stuff from what i've seen, but thanks for sharing the option anyways.

I'm not upset, there's more than enough reason to ban me. I just look at it as punishment from older posts that were out of line. I don't deny that there have been plenty posts where I attacked the person besides the content. It makes the prejudice towards any of my posts understandable.

And I still have the bad tendency where I enjoy defying or mocking a prissy authority, when there's no point to it besides my own indulgence.

It's still mindboggling how certain people can make the transition from Tokyo Ghoul to TG:Re as if it's the most natural progression it could've been. I have respect for their adaptability & compliance with how the author writes the story, not with their unbreakable belief that this is the best story it could've been. It might be the best first try, but it definitily doesn't hurt to redo certain interactions & events.

To me Tokyo Ghoul still feels the most authentic in how it's written, whereas as Re feels more like a collage of fanfictions knitted together or the result of mixed judgements within Ishida's entourage/team. In the early stages a mangaka still has to prove himself and is probably left in nearly full control of the story he/she is writing. The moment that story gains popularity his editor & whoever becomes part of the mangaka's team becomes a lot more involved in the decision-making. A story with a clear focus, gets divided into multiple facets and there is not enough time to always unanimously agree on the best course of action, so they end up going with the most stereotypical way for it to go. That would also explain why so many readers suddenly compare it with mangas that are the epitome of mainstream writing, such as Naruto, bleach & fairy tail & so on. That works only if it was trying to be mainstream since the start, which isn't the case.