Talk:Re: Chapter 130/@comment-86.98.109.99-20170625195046/@comment-27247962-20170626212430

I'm glad you have me all figured out.

Your reasoning regarding the baby not being devoured is plausible. Is it certain? no.

If you understand what the anon means and the 'word' is the problem, why behave in such a difficult way, when you can just present the anon with the better wording to the point he is trying to bring acoss? If you don't, then in what way are you any better then someone who "argues for the sake of arguing"? The only place on top of my head where they point out mistakes without giving you the right answer or push you in the right direction, is school.

But in the end you still jump to the same conclusions, those most convenient to you. Quite the politician you'd be, Dalaios, not budging an inch. But politicians often interpret comments in a way that benefits themselves, which most of the time is a shallow leftover of what was meant. Criticizing others harshly, without being able to criticize yourself, quite the astute  way of self preservation, but nothing quite worth praise or respect.

And if you're going to be butthurt about getting a lecture, then don't do it yourself. If the other anon or whoever lectures me now, then i'll have to accept that. There's plenty that can be said about me doing this as you already scratched the surface off by yourself. But that difference still remains between us & probably the main issue why I can't see eye to eye with you. It would explain a lot if you were actually authistic, i'd honestly feel bad about everything I said, cuz that would be something innate you can't change. Still if you were 100% correct here, i'd give you the credit, but you just aren't, so i'll give you 50% of it.