Talk:Re: Chapter 126/@comment-190.153.81.210-20170528054745/@comment-27247962-20170530202039

^Well that wasn't very clear, considering most arrowheads pointed right at my comments, except the one where you actually adressed the guy. xD

Sure i'm not disagreeing about 'a later stage' most likely being planned by Ishida.

I can understand you're making a preemptive warning here, considering the fan influence once again only revolved around TouKen. But it's no wonder I get confused about your stance or your point, considering TouKen is always the example on which you build your presumptuous advice for what the general behaviour should be in that situation. The only thing fans make a problem off right now, is TouKen, so I engage you from that problematic perspective. As long as I don't hear any other examples besides TouKen being brought up as bad writing or bad decision-making, then i'm not going to make my argument encompass a lot of things that weren't even a problem in this particular discussion.

My bad I thought you & the fandom user were cut from the same cloth, regarding the 'respect the author'-opinion, which I actually do agree with, given time. But acceptance as you put it, not really. Sure the basic amount of acceptance that you'll have to read next chapters with this turn of events in it. But I wouldn't go as far as to accept it to a point where the dislike you have for that turn of event, shouldn't matter anymore. If this comment section is good for one thing, then it's confirming if you're being ridiculously critical about the turn of events or notice that there are more then a few people finding that turn of events dodgy as well.

So my preemptive warning: If you're only here to spread the need for respect & acceptance & patience, then you might as well start voting for a comment section abolishment. That way people are at least not capable of gauging Ishida's decision being considered relatively good or bad with the help off other fans on this wikia forum. And the illusion of people truly accepting whatever Ishida writes will become a reality, at least if you stay on this wikia when it has no comment section.

That about sums up our differences & difference in tightness, considering you expect that off a kid of 3 years old? Well good luck explaining what a company is, how the blocks got in the kid's hands and why he should accept that? Not that it would change the kid's dislike for yellow blocks, who's dislike was purely triggered by the color and not particularly the company's decision. Good luck preventing the kid from not directing his dislike at the fabricator now, considering you are the one that exposed the kid to the blame-culture by having that expectation from him/her. And when it comes to a young-adult audience, let them spout their idealistic criticism and how they can concoct a much better idea to write the situation. What you shouldn't do is highlight that it is the author's decision/idea, because you're just giving the opposition a free ticket to make it into a contest, a competition between person1 (him/herself) & person2. And every competition needs a conclusion with one party being superior to the other. So don't give them that opportunity, instead give them something they can blame, but can't compete with. For example 'preference' or 'taste'.