Talk:One-Eyed King/@comment-90.148.126.159-20151202192849/@comment-25047329-20151204185237

With the whole OEK issue, I feel that it might go one of two ways: Eto is the OEK, or there is no "OEK" and it's more of a figure head to throw people off the trail of who the real leader of Aogiri is. Although, I feel it's Eto non the less, it's just she presents herself as a significantly less important person within the organization.

As far as Eto being the OEK/leader of Aogiri, there's plenty of evidence. The idea that it would be too obvious I don't feel holds much water because Eto's identity had been one long plot twist, one after another. I mean, first we heard of the OEK who because of the title, we assumed was a man. Then we were introduced to Eto as some "little girl" who worked for Aogiri. Finally, we were introduced to Takatsuki Sen, the horror novelist. Throughout the the first series, unraveling the identity of the OEK was a huge sub plot. As the series progressed, we learned that there "was no OEK", that the OEO and the OEK were eventually thought of as one entity, and the OEO/OEK was Yoshimura's child. Then the big plot twist at the end was that all these different personas; Eto, Takatsuki Sen, OEO, OEK, Yoshimura's child, were all the same person. Eto had like, five different plot twists in the original series alone to keep the readers off her trail until the wham shot at the end when she comes out of her huge kakuja.

I mean, everyone is free to theorize as they want, but I feel that saying that there weren't enough plot twists or that the OEK being Eto isn't interesting enough when there were five plot twists before Eto's reveal is ignoring quite a lot.