Board Thread:Wiki Discussions/@comment-27919463-20170818084901

I think it might be worth it to redefine Kagune Detachment and which ghoul is actually capable of doing it and who isn't. This mainly stems from the difference of "natural" and "forced" detachment that caught my eye.

My point is rather easy to understand.

The first detachment we were introduced to were Nutcracker's and Matsumae's detachments. Kagune they seperated from themself and that could act independendely afterwards: reacting to certain things, moving and growing on their own, etc. Basically acting like normal kagune outside of their host.

On the other hand do we have ghouls/hybrids like Kurona and Tooru who literally break parts of their kagune off, once it is in a certain state, and then use it as weapon. This is like a ghoul getting his kagune cut off, picking it up and then using it like a weapon. Yet does this still count as detachment around here, despite it rather being breaking the kagune of and then using it differentely and not the kind of detachment we were introduced to originally. You might wanna mark that as "forced detachment" or something similiar, but I personally don't consider it to be an actual detachment of the kagune.

Then do we also have cases like Ken. He is considered as someone who can detach his kagune because of an instance were he uses a usualy fighting style of his, digging one tentacle underground while drawing the enemies attention with another above ground, where we simply don't see clearly what he is doing in the beginning, until his Kagune emerges from underground and people jumped to the conclusion that he detached his Kagune.

So before starting an edit war somewhere did I bring this up here to possibly discuss about it and how to treat it.

Thank you 